
Philosophical Logic (Tulane Studies In Philosophy)
With this issue we initiate the policy of expanding the scope of Tulane Studies in Philosophy to include, in addition to the work of members of the department, contributions from philosophers who have earned advanced degrees from Tulane and who are now teaching in other colleges and universities. The Editor THE LOGIC OF OUR LANGUAGE ROBERT L. ARRINGTON Wittgenstein wrote in the Tractatus that "log...
File Size: 1089 KB
Print Length: 176 pages
Page Numbers Source ISBN: 9024702909
Publisher: Springer; 1967 edition (December 6, 2012)
Publication Date: December 6, 2012
Sold by: Amazon Digital Services LLC
Language: English
ASIN: B00FCBVNPS
Text-to-Speech: ::::
X-Ray:
Word Wise: Enabled
Lending: Not Enabled
Format: PDF Text TXT ebook
- Springer; 1967 edition (December 6, 2012) pdf
- December 6, 2012 pdf
- Robert L. Arrington pdf
- Robert L. Arrington books
- epub books
Ustin o halloran iano solos volume 2 Read Once a girl now a woman ebook capsnokimyu.wordpress.com A lace o hiing elizabeth george Grae 6 reaing comrehension Download The present malory novels paperback pdf at artepontzanaprov.wordpress.com Final fantasy xi official strategy guide brady games Read Gum grammar usage and mechanics level d ebook oclodans.wordpress.com Download Collective noun or otters pdf at allcennusugutt.wordpress.com Download Popular vintage wisdom for a modern geek pdf at mastbatame.wordpress.com
c is not a body of doctrine, but a mirror-image of the world. " 1 In line with his suggestion that a proposition is a 'picture', Wittgenstein argued that propositions 'show' the logical structure of the real. He was insistent, however, that "the apparent logical form of a proposition need not be its real one. " 2 As a result of this we can misunderstand the structure of fact. Philosophical problems arise just when "the logic of our language is mis understood. " 3 It is common knowledge that much of this view of logic was rejected by Wittgenstein himself in the Philosophical Investi gations. There we are told that language has no ideal or sublime 4 logic which mirrors the structure of the extra-linguistic world. Consequently, inferences from the structure of language to the structure of that extra-linguistic world are invalid. Reality can be 'cut up' in any of a number of ways by language. Wittgenstein adopted a view of philosophy which would render that discipline a non-explanatory, non-critical study of the multiple ways in which language can be used.
Leave a Comment